spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: A heads-up on defaults

2003-12-16 14:36:20
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Mark Farver wrote:

On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 13:47, R. Scott Perry wrote:
It is indeed reporting 2 TXT records, the "real" one and a blank one (see
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch?name=ticom.com&type=TXT
).  However, more important is that only one of your two DNS servers is
reporting that a TX record exists (see
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/traversal.ch?name=ticom.com&type=TXT ).

The extra blank reply is not cool.. but a minor annoyance, and it might
already be fixed. (I am one version behind)

Don't worry about it, if the spf implementation follows the spec it will
ignore the extra "".

-- 
[http://pointless.net/]                                   [0x2ECA0975]

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡