On Dec 16, 2003, at 12:44 PM, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
One of the comments at
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/16/
0349243&mode=thread&tid=111&tid=126&tid=95
says SPF is not promising because so few domains have registered.
Indeed, when I first saw the registry I was worried that it's existence
would give people the wrong impression: That SPF required a central
registry. Seems like this might be true.
Don't get me wrong, I like the registry as I'm enjoying seeing the SPF
uptake... but perhaps the text on the registry page needs to be very
very clear that 1) SPF does not use a central registry and 2) It is
just a public place to show that you are supporting SPF.
Call me the "word-smith", but perhaps "registry" was a poor choice of
word in this context. Perhaps renaming it the "Roll Call of Domains
supporting SPF" or some such would ease the confusion.
Lastly, do you intend to actually make the list of domains available?
Once the list gets sizable, this could be interesting.
- Mark
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡