spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: A heads-up on defaults

2003-12-16 15:04:52
Jasper Wallace wrote:

Don't worry about it, if the spf implementation follows the spec it will
ignore the extra "".

Ok - the problem I've got here is that PHP's DNS support won't get TXT records, so I have to do things "the hard way" - the record there is just the output of /usr/bin/host - which I expect to put each TXT record on a seperate line.

Unless I know why that blank record is there, and also that 1) it will also be blank and 2) the SPF record will always be the first one, I'm not sure I can work around it.


On another note, I think I've tackled the issues raised on slashdot, as well as cleaning up the bulk-parser which was throwing up extra errors.

We're now up to:

396 domains with SPF records are known.
Of these:
164 parse cleanly
1 parse with warnings
231 parse with errors
0 are yet to be checked by this system


As I've noted before, once the default=deny records are removed, I'll be able to examine the remaining errors more closely.

        Wechsler

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>