----- Original Message -----
From: "Meng Weng Wong" <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] spf entries for which hosts ???
the v=spf2.0/pra entry is not necessary if its content is
the same as a v=spf1 record. Sender ID receivers will fall
back to v=spf1 records if they do not see an spf2.0 record.
this is the common case --- scope disambiguation with /pra
and /mfrom is only relevant to a small minority of cases.
Why is Meng discussing Sender-ID receivers using spfv2 when we haven't
agreed what spfv2 will be yet?
Why is Meng discussing TWO spf records for those who want to use spf-classic
*and* Sender-ID, when this has *not* been agreed by the spf community?
There seems to be a range of issues which Meng needs to explain *fully* to
the lists, including the results of his recent conversations with M$.
Given this list of events which Meng is attending --
----- Original Message -----
From: "Meng Weng Wong" <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com>
To: <spf-deployment(_at_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 12:20 AM
Subject: [spf-deployment] november events
November seems to be National Antispam Month:
Nov 1-3: MAAWG meeting, http://www.maawg.org/ Atlanta, GA
Nov 2-4: ISPcon, http://www.ispcon.com/ Santa Clara
Nov 9-10: FTC Email Authentication Summit, Washington DC
Nov 7-12: IETF, Washington DC
Nov 14-19: LISA, Atlanta, GA
Nov 17-19: Inbox Event, http://www.inboxevent.com/ Atlanta, GA
Nov 16: Meng arrives early at the Inbox Event to discuss SPF, etc
Dec 1: Accountable Net event in SFBA
I will be at Inbox a day early on Nov 16 to discuss what
email will look like once authentication + reputation +
accreditation are plugged in to the system.
The spf community needs to decide what the "official spf-community policy"
is going to be.
Slainte,
JohnP.
johnp(_at_)idimo(_dot_)com
ICQ 313355492