On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:05:53 +0200, Koen Martens wrote
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 11:41:03AM +0200, Frank Ellermann wrote:
David Brodbeck wrote:
Also, I'm going to state now that if SenderID goes through
using existing records, I will probably stop publishing a
record.
Seconded. SenderID is incompatible with v=spf1. Bye, Frank
Hooray, one more win for microsoft: they'll just use spf1 records and
everyone starts pulling back records. That's great news for ms, I think
they will be happy to see you cooperating with them in ending spf
once and for all.
I'm gonna be blunt here. I don't care that much about the good of SPF. What
I care about is what works for me.
Right now, SPF works for me. It provides a small but definate benefit to me
to publish. The false positive risks are very clear cut and don't present a
problem for me.
When PRA comes in, with all its vague rules, it's a lot less clear to me what
the risk of false positives will be. That turns SPF from a benefit to a
liability. Why would I publish something that's a liability to me?