On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 10:31:05AM -0400, David Brodbeck wrote:
Also, I'm going to state now that if SenderID goes through using existing
records, I will probably stop publishing a record. I find SPF easy to
understand, and I know that in my situation it's unlikely to cause false
positives. I find SenderID complicated and my gut feeing is that it's too
risky.
Please give us the option of not allowing SenderID checks against our records.
Unfortunatelly, it's not up to any of us. If microsoft decides it will
use spf1 records, who's gonna stop them? They can do what they want,
it's just like that.
koen
--
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/