spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune

2004-10-21 09:24:33
In 
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)58(_dot_)0410210905160(_dot_)21617(_at_)snoopy(_dot_)smi(_dot_)sendmail(_dot_)com>
 Rand Wacker <rand(_at_)sendmail(_dot_)com> writes:

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, wayne wrote:

I can understand SenderID and DK milters, as I don't think anyone else
has done those, but I don't see any obviously clear reasons for yet
another SPF milter.

Interop testing perhaps?

Have you tested it against the SPF test suite?

Not yet, I was actually cruising around the list today looking for
possible pointers to such.  There isn't much detail at:

      http://spf.pobox.com/certification.html

For developers, the following web page is probably more useful.  

http://spf.pobox.com/developers-guide.html

(I'm not sure how to find this page, other than through the "site map"
link.)

Anyway, one test suite is available at:
http://www.midwestcs.com/spf/tests/


-wayne