----- Original Message -----
From: "wayne" <wayne(_at_)midwestcs(_dot_)com>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Re: When did we lose control?
In
<C6DDA43B91BFDA49AA2F1E473732113E010BECC3(_at_)mou1wnexm05(_dot_)vcorp(_dot_)ad(_dot_)vrsn(_dot_)com>
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com> writes:
* Amend the protocol for v=spf1 with a modifier, as
requested by Rand, so that those who wish to state their
record can't be used for pra checking can do so; and,
In what alternative universe do you think that can be
enforced and under what theory of law?
Agreed
PRA is already implemented and active. Nothing this or any
other group can do will change that.
For various definitions of "implemented" and "active", yes. From the
best data I have, every day it loses ground to SPF deployment though.
Did someone mention deployment? Latest at -
http://www.spfhelp.com/newnews.html
Slainte,
JohnP.
johnp(_at_)idimo(_dot_)com
ICQ 313355492