On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 14:44, wayne wrote:
In <41796C22(_dot_)A68(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> Frank Ellermann
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> writes:
John Glube wrote:
* Do we have a clear understanding of where it is we want
to go with spf2.0?
No, I don't think we have a clear understanding yet.
I also think that there is a very real danger that if we start working
on SPFv2 before the SPFv1 draft is published as at least an
experimental RFC, that it will be both a distraction and possibly
cause the IESG to reject the SPFv1 draft as "already being obsolete".
I very much agree with this sentiment.
There is very little that remains to be said of the SPFv1 spec, to do
other than to complete this I believe to be not in our best interest.
Please lets arrive at a consensus and simply finish SPFv1. I agree to
bring libSPF in line with whatever final changes are made to this spec.
Wayne I suggest that you do the same -- rather than just implementing
whatever *you* believe the spec should be. What you are doing with your
library isn't helping. And I mean this without spite and its intended
interpretation is void of malice.
I will continue to provide a flat library offering little more than the
finalized SPFv1 specification whatever that may be.
Cheers,
James
--
James Couzens,
Programmer
^ ( ( (
((__)) __\|/__ __|+|__ '. ___ .'
(00) (o o) (0~0) ' (> <) '
---nn-(o__o)-nn---ooO--(_)--Ooo--ooO--(_)--Ooo---ooO--(_)--Ooo---
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7A7C7DCF
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part