-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of wayne
.
.
.
I have *long* said that:
1) The PRA patent license is a deal killer and can not be accepted.
2) The PRA is untested, in theory doesn't work well, and what little
pratical experience has been gained so far shows that theory
matches practice.
This, however, is something I think the market will be able to deal
with. There is something called "reality" that won't go away, even
when a very powerful company says something that conflicts with it.
He Wayne,
I agree in lots of the points raised here. Dont understand me wrong.
I dont like PRA at all - but you cannot say its untested.
Considering hat PRA is more or less the same as the fetchmail
algorithm...
Thanks a lot
Stefan
This mail was checked for malicious code and viruses
by GFI MailSecurity. GFI MailSecurity provides email content
checking, exploit detection, threats analysis and anti-virus for
Exchange & SMTP servers. Viruses, Trojans, dangerous
attachments and offensive content are removed automatically.
Key features include: multiple virus engines; email content and
attachment checking; an exploit shield; an HTML threats engine;
a Trojan & Executable Scanner; and more.
In addition to GFI MailSecurity, GFI also produces the
GFI MailEssentials anti-spam software, the GFI FAXmaker
fax server & GFI LANguard network security product ranges.
For more information on our products, please visit
http://www.gfi.com. This disclaimer was sent by
GFI MailEssentials for Exchange/SMTP.