The forgery could be false though couldn't it? If the e-mail had been through a
forwarding server or something like that? (One that doesn't do SES or any other
form of re-writing).
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex van den Bogaerdt
[mailto:alex(_at_)ergens(_dot_)op(_dot_)het(_dot_)net]
Sent: 21 October 2005 14:19
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 05:07:10AM -0700, Sandipan Chowdhury wrote:
I want to publish SPF record for my domain in order to ensure I am not
blocked by servers who do SPF check before accpting emails.
However, I want that my servers would not do any SPF check before
accepting any emails. I hope this is possible as the above two things
are totally differently managed. Please correct me if I am wrong.
This is possible as, indeed, these two parts are completely separate.
Be aware that people publishing SPF would like you to pay attention
to their record. If you receive a forgery and if the domain was SPF
protected, you should have rejected it. This is how the system works.
Why would you want to accept forgeries?
Alex
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate
your subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)co
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com