Yes, but then we get back into the old argument of the sender does not know
(And may not care) that his message was sent via a forwarder... he just wants
it to be delivered.
And the same goes for a small business who's ISP uses a forwarder to forward
all of their e-mail to their ISP account....
Some say the forwarder is wrong, other disagree... but until it is resolved you
cannot delete on fail without risking losing valid e-mail.
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: j o a r [mailto:joar(_at_)joar(_dot_)com]
Sent: 21 October 2005 15:02
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider
On 21 okt 2005, at 15.23, Dan Field wrote:
The forgery could be false though couldn't it? If the e-mail had
been through a forwarding server or something like that? (One that
doesn't do SES or any other form of re-writing).
Perhaps false from the point of view of the person doing the forward,
but not if you ask the domain owner.
j o a r
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate
your subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)co
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com