-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ulrike vom Stein wrote:
its a customer requirement either full open source or no open source
at all. My customer is a situated in a high security business and they
trust only the one or other modell.
Well, if GFI incorporating a BSD-like licensed libspf is considered neither
fully open-source nor fully closed-source, then they shouldn't be using
Windows either. It does contain openly available source code, even though
it is a closed-source product otherwise.
Of course they're free to delude themselves.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE7b6fwL7PKlBZWjsRAqtnAJ44uaB9SBKhhAJDkKiNGmRQDDpQlwCfQ94b
VvMCGZND8l0nufFOEX8vwS0=
=bEaj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com