[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-822] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-inreply-react-00.txt

2020-09-14 20:50:35
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:37:06 -0700, Dave Crocker said:
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-inreply-react-00.txt
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:42:46 -0700
From: internet-drafts(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net>

A new version of I-D, draft-crocker-inreply-react-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Dave Crocker and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:         draft-crocker-inreply-react
Revision:     00
Title:                React: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message

   For recipient MUAs that do not support this mechanism, the header
   field might not be displayed to the recipient.  To ensure that the
   reaction is presented to the recipient, the the responding MUA MAY
   automatically include a second copy of the header field in the
   message body.

In-Reply-React: Egads!

Is there enough overlap between "people who use emojis" and
people who use email and people who use MUAs likely to be updated
to support this, to have a decent chance of it getting traction?

   in-reply-react = "In-Reply-React:" emoji *(lwsp emoji) CRLF

So is that 'emoji' a raw UTF-8, or UTF-16, or encoded, or what?

It also fails to address the question of MUA behavior when the "nope badger"
is the proper response....

(Maybe I'm just cranky because I've been chasing a stupid font problem
that makes my MUA blow up every time certain emojis get used in a
Subject: line and it ends up pointing at a corrupted font character that
has a negative width, and Linux 'fontconfig' doesn't make it easy to
figure out which actual font file was used as the render source)

Attachment: pgp5TbEJYkWp3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

ietf-822 mailing list
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>