On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 7:39 PM Dave Crocker <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net>
wrote:
On 9/15/2020 11:15 AM, Brandon Long wrote:
Forgive me, I assumed it was a joke and reacted in kind.
You assumed that I wrote an internet-draft specification, submitted it,
and forwarded a copy of the notice to this list was a joke? A draft
which contained pointedly mundane specification language, followed
typically mundane specification style, and had no language, reference or
apparent indication of irony. You thought that was a joke?
And you thought that acting on an assumption lacking any meaningful
foundation was appropriate to pursue in public, in that fashion?
What's most odd is that your usual tone and content of postings in this
forum are notably professional.
So, forgive me but your forgive me seems just a bit thin.
I realize that "it was just a joke" is a thin excuse in general. I could
further
attempt to explain my rationale, but that is ultimately irrelevant.
Instead, I apologize for my statements.
Brandon
_______________________________________________
ietf-822 mailing list
ietf-822(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822