At 1:54 PM -0800 3/23/03, william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net wrote:
> 2. Relative amount of spam
a) spam as a percentage of total email (spam messages / total messages)
b) spam as a percentage of *non-spam* email (spam messages / accepted
messages)
Would like to all see: size of spam messages / total size of email messages
size of regular emails / total size of spam
I assume that we understand that these numbers are going to be very
inaccurate? Because if they were accurate, then presumably we'd know
how to identify spam and we wouldn't be having this conversation.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.puremessaging.com/ Junk-Free Email Filtering
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg