On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 17:50:12 -0800
Brad Templeton <brad(_at_)templetons(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 04:31:22PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
Would it not be sufficient simply to assure anonymous mail can not be
sent in large volumes?
Is that the function of a protocol definition, or of policy and
configuration at a protocol-supporting node?
That is what most anonymous remailers do to avoid being used as spam
gateways today.
Quite, and rather my point.
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw(_at_)kanga(_dot_)nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg