On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 08:30:10 +1100
Troy Rollo <asrg(_at_)troy(_dot_)rollo(_dot_)name> wrote:
But of course I also consider anything that sacrifices the
availability of anonymity in email to be a bad thing.
Please clarify. Do you limit that to human identity, or both human and
network identity?
I largely suspect that the problem per se can't be handled until/unless
we have full audit trails which can be tracked backward to the point
where a given message entered the "mail network". The trust metrics
involved can be pretty soft -- the primary NO GO zone for me is removing
the autonomous decentralised peer-to-peer nature of SMTP, or its
store-and-forward characteristics. I'd like to preserve deliberate
anonymity, but I'm willing for those cases to be clearly visible (big
flashing neon signs, "THE AUTHOR MADE THIS ANONYMOUS" etc).
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw(_at_)kanga(_dot_)nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg