On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Claus v. Wolfhausen <
c(_dot_)v(_dot_)wolfhausen(_at_)spamkiller(_dot_)uceprotect(_dot_)net> wrote:
Steve wrote:
>Just because one blacklist does something doesn't mean that a BCP
document is required to consider that behaviour a "best common practice" and
describe it as such[1].
Really? I start to believe that many people in this group have no clue what
BCP stand for.
Now see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_Current_Practice
*A Best Current Practice (BCP) means that a certain manner of proceeding is
in general the most logical choice -- a **de facto*
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_facto>* standard of sorts*
**
Now let's analyze that:
In every civilization that I have seen, those that fail to behave correctly,
will have to live with the sanctions.
If you break a law, then you will be punished.
If you break a law accidently or willfully does not matter in most
civilizations.
That's probably where you and the rest of DNSBLs differ; I think most DNSBLs
publish listings in order to protect our users, not to punish listees.
--kelly
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg