ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-04.txt

2007-03-14 11:41:31
Absolutely. 

And the question that I raized was rather different. The question is whether we 
should publish a version of the overview with references to policy taken out.

I do not accept that we have to wait till completion of the policy 
specification to publish a version of overview. It is sufficient to have last 
call on the policy requirements. The overview document does not go into the 
details of how policy works, requirements are sufficient. 

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave Crocker
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 11:11 AM
To: Eliot Lear
Cc: Untitled; Powers, Jot
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: I-D 
ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-04.txt



Eliot Lear wrote:
Jot,

The overview isn't keeping DKIM from the world.  In fact 
you guys can 
sign today, if you don't already (haven't checked).

Eliot, you are, of course, correct.  But that rather misses the point.

The point is what will facilitate adoption.  (Why is it that 
the IETF works so hard to ignore adoption issues, as we think 
merely publishing a document is the end of the task?)

The Overview document, approximately in its current form 
(IMO), can be extremely helpful for the rest of the 
community, to understand DKIM and make deployment and use 
decisions about it.


 > The real question
for me now is simply this: will those people who are writing the 
overview now commit to updating it after SSP is complete?  
And I for 
one want to see SSP complete quickly.

Whether the current document is "updated", or a new document 
is written, or an overview section in the SSP specification 
itself is added strikes me as a decision to make at the time 
we need the additional writing.

I'm certainly happy to commit to putting in the effort to 
make sure there is text of an overview style for SSP.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>