Dave Crocker wrote:
The real question
for me now is simply this: will those people who are writing the
overview now commit to updating it after SSP is complete? And I for
one want to see SSP complete quickly.
Whether the current document is "updated", or a new document is written,
or an overview section in the SSP specification itself is added strikes
me as a decision to make at the time we need the additional writing.
I could be wrong, but I believe he was referring to backward
compatibility issues with a new legacy market of DKIM-BASE only systems
vs DKIM-BASE PLUS SSS systems.
I'm certainly happy to commit to putting in the effort to make sure
there is text of an overview style for SSP.
Well, IMO, you talk about independent, value-added assessment services
in a futuristic manner anyway, why SSP wasn't there or included in the
first place speaks volumes about the true nature of the problem here.
FWIW, I am prime example of a target audience member your overview
attempts to address. I would probably be asking "what are these
independent, value-added services, and do they exist today?"
--
HLS
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html