Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?

ietf

Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?

2008-02-20 11:16:00

Hi -

From: "lconroy" <lconroy(_at_)insensate(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>
To: "IETF discussion list" <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:23 AM
Subject: ISO 3166 mandatory?

...

why am I REQUIRED to enter the ISO-3166 code for my country  
of residence.

...

Quite right.  It should use UN M.49 codes instead.
;-)

Randy

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, (continued) Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, David Conrad Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Frank Ellermann Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, David Conrad Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Frank Ellermann Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, John C Klensin Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, David Conrad Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Bill Manning Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, John C Klensin Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Stephane Bortzmeyer Problems during transition (was Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?), Alexey Melnikov Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Randy Presuhn <= Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Stephane Bortzmeyer Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Dave Cridland Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, David Conrad Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Iljitsch van Beijnum

Previous by Date:	Re: amsl.com certificate?, David Morris
Next by Date:	Re: amsl.com certificate?, John C Klensin
Previous by Thread:	Problems during transition (was Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?), Alexey Melnikov
Next by Thread:	Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]