ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?

2008-02-20 14:21:55
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 07:25:17PM +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote:
lconroy wrote:

I guess that the IETF Meeting Registration pages are run by/on
behalf of the IETF, and that's where the mandatory code is required.

Tons of forms want this for obscure purposes, if in doubt I pick UM.

        UM... glad to have you aboard...  www.nic.um  :)

The history of UK vs. GB is explained in RFC 3071 - for unrelated
reasons I read it yesterday again.  Obviously one country should
have one code, and as far as that that code is mnemonic it should
depend on the name of the country.  In theory "united kingdom" can
be less persistent - in various countries that's not only a theory.

        actually, there were other issues w/ the use of
        country codes & the IETF in recent memory. A -MUCH-
        more sensitive approach is to call these entities 
        "economies"  :)

--bill


--bill
Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>