Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?

David Conrad wrote:

If you don't think a code should exist, take it up with ISO-3166 MA.


The IAB will do if an RFC tries the stunt to use "exceptionally
reserved" codes as country codes.  And if the "ccSNO" obsoleted
RFC 1591 and IDP-1 they failed to inform the Internet at large:
<http://forum.icann.org/lists/idn-cctld-fast-track/msg00001.html>

 Frank

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, (continued) Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Daniel Brown Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, lconroy Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Frank Ellermann Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Tony Finch Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Frank Ellermann Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, David Conrad Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Frank Ellermann Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, David Conrad Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Frank Ellermann Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, David Conrad Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Frank Ellermann <= Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, John C Klensin Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, David Conrad Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Tony Finch Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Bill Manning Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, John C Klensin Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Stephane Bortzmeyer Problems during transition (was Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?), Alexey Melnikov Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Randy Presuhn Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Stephane Bortzmeyer Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, Dave Cridland

Previous by Date:	Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, David Conrad
Next by Date:	Re: amsl.com certificate?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Previous by Thread:	Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, David Conrad
Next by Thread:	Re: ISO 3166 mandatory?, John C Klensin
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]