I think that for each 9 meetings ( 3 year cycle ) 1 meeting would be in
South America and another in Africa.
________________________________
De: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter(_at_)stpeter(_dot_)im>
Para: Ross Callon <rcallon(_at_)juniper(_dot_)net>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 11 de Agosto de 2010 17:08:34
Assunto: Re: IETF Attendance by continent
I like the 1-1-1-* model: of every 4 meetings, hold 1 in North America,
1 in Europe, 1 in Asia, and 1 anywhere (could be one of the above or
some "non-standard" location like Africa or South America if that can be
worked out).
On 8/11/10 1:27 PM, Ross Callon wrote:
I don't see why the model has to add up to a multiple of 3 -- we have
an essentially unlimited number of future meetings to schedule, and
should be able handle a grouping that doesn't necessarily end on a
year boundary each time.
My problem with 3-2-1 is that I am not sure whether the "1" should be
Europe or Asia, since the number of participants seems to be
relatively similar from each. It does occur to me that North America
still seems to have more active "repeat offenders" than the other
continents.
This leads me to wonder about a 3-2-2 model.
Ross
PS: I have also wondered why July seems to usually land us in Europe,
and I am quite looking forward to next July in Quebec City (pretty
much all of Canada being nice that time of year).
-----Original Message----- From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Yoav Nir Sent: Monday,
August 09, 2010 5:47 AM To: IETF discussion list Subject: Re: IETF
Attendance by continent
I'm more in favor the 3-2-1 model. The stats clearly show that the
largest group of "repeat offenders" comes from the US.
But either way, I also agree that Europe is the summer is not ideal.
in the US there's much less of the "vacances" phenomenon.
So how about: - March in Europe - July in N America - November either
in Asia or some other place (Africa, S America) or maybe sometimes in
N America, depending on which model we pick.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf