ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

2017-04-04 15:46:30
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 09:42:57PM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:

Hi Nico,

On 04/04/17 21:24, Nico Williams wrote:
My unstated point was that the US border situation is not really
different from anywhere else.

I disagree. I think that as of now, of the places in which
we're likely to have face-to-face meetings, the uncertainty
with respect to rule-changes involved in future US meetings
is much higher than other places. Again, that's only in terms
of places in which we're likely to meet in the next N years.
That's a mega-negative for US-based meetings IMO.

        I welcome the data that is being collected vs all the
armchair responses.

        This reminds me of the IPv6-only question, there's the
zero users that were on the IPv6-only ssid in chicago.  This may
be a real issue, or not.

        I think the thread can end until the data is reported
and we can then provide our commentary on that.

        - Jared

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from 
jared(_at_)puck(_dot_)nether(_dot_)net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>