Ken wrote:
But clearly the "MH way" was to silently discard sequences that
exceeded the per-folder limit. That doesn't mean that it should
always be the way, of course.
It'd be nice if it wasn't that way.
And I also think that nmh shouldn't have such a low limit on
the number of sequences. Even 59 is, or will soon be, too
low for someone. It'd be nice if we wouldn't have to
reimplement C++ std::vector to get dynamic sizing. Short
of that, I'm with Paul V. on falling back to a bit vector.
David
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers