On Oct 26, 3:20pm, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
That's not necessarily appropriate for a metadata system that's more
complex than simple inline markup. Metadata may be a tree or some
other such structure.
I don't follow. They are semantically identical to your \m{ } and
\M{ } examples:
\m{foo} === <foo>
\M{foo} === <!foo>
I would have thought both syntaxen were capable of identifying metadata
of arbitrarily complex structures.
Or have I missed something important?
A
--
Andy Wardley <abw(_at_)kfs(_dot_)org> Signature regenerating. Please remain
seated.
<abw(_at_)cre(_dot_)canon(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> For a good time:
http://www.kfs.org/~abw/
