On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 05:25:18AM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
|
| My original intention was to convince Meng that it would be a good idea to
| pick a small group of "ambassadors" and let them hear what his plans were.
| That group could then reassure the rest of us that there was a reasonable
| plan in place and the interests of the open source community was being
| looked after properly. This is still a reasonable scenario and not overly
| burdensome.
|
more of a Grey Council than "ambassadors", i think ... but i
will do exactly this; i will explain our past strategy and
future strategy to a small group, and thereby distribute the
cries of conspiracy across that group; anyone who disagrees
with the strategy is welcome to start their own list and I
will provide resources to do so.
the fact is that over the last two weeks i have been
1) sick with a cold
2) traveling across europe to talk to ISPs about SPF and
Sender ID
3) working on a white paper that tells implementers who don't
care about all the politics what they need to do
4) trying to find funding for future development of SPF
5) holding off MS's various demands in the area of Sender ID
6) organizing november conferences
7) building a next-generation prototype to demo
So defending myself on the list from ad hominem attacks has
been rather low on the list of priorities. I'm trying to
achieve the goals; flamewars are entertaining but not
ultimately very productive.