On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
BTW, the above implies that postmaster(_at_)x(_dot_)example(_dot_)com *is*
equivalent to <> (on HELO of x.example.com). Is that the
case?
Thus spoke Wayne (2.2 MAIL FROM identity):
| When the reverse-path is null, this document defines the
| "MAIL FROM" identity to be the mailbox composed of the
| localpart "postmaster" and the "HELO" identity (which may
| or may not have been checked separately before).
Yeah, I knew that. I was asking about the *converse*. Is it true that:
When the MAIL FROM identity is composed of the localpart "postmaster"
and the HELO identity, then the reverse-path is null.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com