Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Frank Ellermann wrote:
<snip>
| When the reverse-path is null, this document defines the
| "MAIL FROM" identity to be the mailbox composed of the
| localpart "postmaster" and the "HELO" identity (which may
| or may not have been checked separately before).
Yeah, I knew that. I was asking about the *converse*. Is it true that:
When the MAIL FROM identity is composed of the localpart "postmaster"
and the HELO identity, then the reverse-path is null.
The reverse path *could* be null, but it doesn't *have* to be null.
e.g. if I have an employee designated to respond to the postmaster
mailbox acting/responding as the postmaster, that real person responding
would have a reverse path, despite your other 2 conditions could match.
--
Terry Fielder
terry(_at_)greatgulfhomes(_dot_)com
Associate Director Software Development and Deployment
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
Fax: (416) 441-9085
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com