Re: reply etiquette
2004-09-30 05:26:14
Paul Smith writes:
If the bug reports went to a distribution list of developers, then I'd
expect the *developers* to know that in *that particular instance*
they should send replies back to the original sender. A bug report
list is NOT the same as a mailing list discussing email protocols,
it's quite different.
Could you elaborate on the differences, particularly as regards
reply-to, mail-followup-to, group replies etc? I'd also be interested
in your thoughts on Keld's three examples.
(During 2004 I have personally been in all three examples Keld mentions,
so IMO they're quite realistic.)
Arnt
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: reply etiquette, (continued)
- Re: reply etiquette, Paul Smith
- Re: reply etiquette,
Arnt Gulbrandsen <=
- Re: reply etiquette, Paul Smith
- Re: reply etiquette, Philip Hazel
- Re: reply etiquette, Paul Smith
- Re: reply etiquette, Philip Hazel
- Re: reply etiquette, Bruce Lilly
- Re: reply etiquette, Philip Hazel
- Re: reply etiquette, Keith Moore
- Re: reply etiquette, Philip Hazel
- Re: reply etiquette, Keld Jørn Simonsen
- Re: reply etiquette, Steve Dorner
|
|
|