me too. which is why I don't want an identity that is tracable to
the actual sender to the message; instead, I want an identity that
can only be associated with whether the sender has a history of
sending abusive mail.
I understand that this is the american way to see things.
I don't know if it's typically american or not.
But not all people on the world share this view.
And, btw, it doesn't work if the sender is free to use a new
"identity" every day.
no, but senders that do that will always have "new" identities, and
recipients will (if they choose) be reluctant to accept mail from them.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg