Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
On 07/20/2011 03:29 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
We have last-call reviews and comments from Alexey, Stephan, and me.
Any others? There's still a week and a half to review it.
It's OK. No substantial new issues since I reviewed.
I'm not entirely fond of the rules governing upload. If a is marked
active and includes b, then I don't see why upload should treat a and
b differently.
I have to admit that that is something that bothered me a bit as well.
However I can buy into an argument that a client which is going to
upload multiple related scripts can either disable the active script, or
upload it under a new name and then enable. (I am sure there are other
reasonable choices.).
But this makes me wonder if we can add a new ManageSieve response code
to detect include related errors?
But that's a foo bar detail. In general the draft has about the right
degree of verbosity, examples, etc: Good.
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve