On Thu, 8 May 2003, The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman wrote:
I am developing a strong preference for OCP/OCPTRAN; I think it will
smaller and cleaner than BEEP for our purposes, and more likely to be
able to encompass other protocols. My preferential expression would be
75% OCP/OCPTRAN, 20% OCP/BEEP, 5% ICAP2.0.
Just for the record, in the parallel terminology used in prior
e-mails and on jfc web site, this vote is equivalent to:
ICAP/1.1: 5%
ICAP/2.0: 75%
OCP/BEEP: 20%
From now on, let's avoid confusing references to ICAP for the
OCP/OCPTRAN solution. So let's use these:
ICAP/1.1 (polished ICAP, very similar to existing ICAP/1.0)
OCP/OCPTRAN (OCP over OCPTRAN)
OCP/BEEP (OCP over BEEP)
Both OCP/OCPTRAN and OCP/BEEP may eventually be called ICAP/2.0 for
political/marketing reasons, but let's ignore the naming issue for
now.
Thank you,
Alex.