At 23:48 08/05/03, Alex Rousskov wrote:
Just for the record, in the parallel terminology used in prior
e-mails and on jfc web site, this vote is equivalent to:
ICAP/1.1: 5%
ICAP/2.0: 75%
OCP/BEEP: 20%
>From now on, let's avoid confusing references to ICAP for the
OCP/OCPTRAN solution. So let's use these:
ICAP/1.1 (polished ICAP, very similar to existing ICAP/1.0)
OCP/OCPTRAN (OCP over OCPTRAN)
OCP/BEEP (OCP over BEEP)
Reworded site for you. I am to go home. Now. May I expect your list?
Also we could record the people's position in % as decision factor.
See site. http://jefsey.com/ocph.htm
Both OCP/OCPTRAN and OCP/BEEP may eventually be called ICAP/2.0 for
political/marketing reasons, but let's ignore the naming issue for
now.