On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:31:57AM +0200, Frank Ellermann wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kolkman-appeal-support
...it's just wrong.
I think he's got a good idea. It maybe could use some tweaking.
The IETF should stop doing things that are not relevant to its
constituency and serve only to waste its (donated) time-dollars.
This includes but is not limited to: appeals from total nuts.
One perfectly acceptable tactic, which Olafur has codified in this
draft, is to limit appeals to only those made by mixed nuts.
I think it would be more productive to suggest alternative tactics
than to ask Olafur to withdraw his draft. We would all like to
know what other options there are.
I didn't try to find three "paying members" to
support that opinion, and nobody else is "qualified" to support it :-(
...nor would you have had to.
--
ISC Training! October 16-20, 2006, in the San Francisco Bay Area,
covering topics from DNS to DDNS & DHCP. Email
training(_at_)isc(_dot_)org(_dot_)
--
David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
pgp3jmgTps2QN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf