and a always-paying-attention operator (for each room) to know when to switch
- potentially adding significantly
to the cost
fwiw - standing in a place where you can be seen by the camera so that the
remote experience is better
without having to dedicate a camera operator to each room seems a very very
small price to pay
Scott
On Jul 24, 2015, at 12:48 PM, Bob Hinden
<bob(_dot_)hinden(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Jul 24, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Brian E Carpenter
<brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 24/07/2015 22:23, Adrian Farrel wrote:
...
A proposal...
Could Meetecho please just zoom out.
Alternative proposal...
Make the pink box a guide for speakers who want to be in frame, but stop
telling
us that we MUST stand in the box.
Also, we *really* need a repeater screen so that the person speaking can see
the slides without eyes in the back of his/her head. Speaking coherently
about
a slide that I cannot see is beyond my powers.
While we are talking about making remote participation better.
I watched a recorded working group session last night. Currently the video
is only of the slides and a small view of the speaker. Unfortunately, when
someone comes to the microphone, you don’t get to see them speak. It would
be much better if one could see them when they talk. This might require
panning the main camera, or a second camera (and I guess a second “pink
square”).
Bob
Brian