--On Friday, July 24, 2015 12:55 PM -0400 "Scott O. Bradner"
<sob(_at_)sobco(_dot_)com> wrote:
and a always-paying-attention operator (for each room) to
know when to switch - potentially adding significantly to the
cost
And "potentially too expensive" is the choice we seem to
continue to make relative to "better and more useful remote
experience".
fwiw - standing in a place where you can be seen by the camera
so that the remote experience is better without having to
dedicate a camera operator to each room seems a very very
small price to pay
Agreed, but that doesn't solve either the chair problem or the
floor mic one. Those can be mitigated by the chair walking
into the box rather than sitting and running the meeting and by
people at the floor mics getting a lot better at announcing
their names, but the realistic alternative is either a lot more
panning or multiple cameras and switching, either of which
require human attention.
john