ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Registration for remote participation

2017-05-09 16:23:02
+1 for better data collection. We do need it.

As for other future charging developments brought up by Stephen, those are 
perhaps a point to be discussed in the later. For sure the potential for 
changing the model should be acknowledged. But, I have no reason to doubt that 
IETF’s community’s wishes wouldn’t be driving whatever direction remote 
participation may develop into.

Jari

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail