+1
None of the questions asked are in invasive, while helping us to better
understand remote participation dynamics.
I also think adding few questions about "why remote" would help us in the
future to make better choices when it comes to organization.
Regards,
Jeff
On May 9, 2017, at 14:22, Jari Arkko <jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net>
wrote:
+1 for better data collection. We do need it.
As for other future charging developments brought up by Stephen, those are
perhaps a point to be discussed in the later. For sure the potential for
changing the model should be acknowledged. But, I have no reason to doubt
that IETF’s community’s wishes wouldn’t be driving whatever direction remote
participation may develop into.
Jari