At 19:45 2003-09-10 +0200, Nikolaus Hiebaum wrote:
Until now I have been using the "classical" method:
:0 c
! name(_at_)account2(_dot_)com
The "classical" method as you call it is over simplified and prone to many
failures - for instance, mail loops.
That's what I need to change. :) Can I modify the "Return-Path:" header
with formail?
Have you considered TRYING it? Check out the SANDBOX setup documented at
the pages linked from my .sig
:0c
| formail -i "Return-Path: somewhere" | $SENDMAIL account2 -f account1
though of course, you should put in loop checking, but that's already been
posted...
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail