On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:59:11PM +0200, Dallman Ross wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 11:40:08AM -0400, Louis N Proyect wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:
Louis N Proyect schreef:
the thing I could never understand is why a simple filter on
the presence of "Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64" failed
to work.
If you are specifically disinterested in any message that has
a base64-encoded part announced in the message header, then
it is simple:
:0
* ^Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64$ /dev/null
This and similar test *do not work*. If it did, I never would
have bothered badgering this mailing list.
That's mainly because many base64-encoded messages don't have
that string in the main header. They have it only in a relevant
message mime-subpart. See my companion post from just a moment
ago.
I think I should have clarified further that procmail's default
condition --
:0
* regex-string
works only on the message header. To test for "regex-string"
in either the head or the body, you can do this, among many ways:
:0
* HB ?? regex-string
--
dman
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail