-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of
dejanspf(_at_)ztbclan(_dot_)com
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 7:40 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] Dealing with SPF problems
I don't know five Blockbuster customers who care enough about SPF to rent
somewhere else. In fact, I don't know one who even knows what SPF is.
Trying to change the world has zero chance of success. Changing email
protocols is a long shot, but one I'm willing to spend some time on.
Not that hard, just need to give example :
- Many mails received in my domains are invalid and already marked by
spamassasin because of .... Whathewer ....
Right now I'm using SPF :
- fail is fail -> rejected
- pass -> -1 spamassasin score
- softfail -> +4 spamassasin score
- neutral -> +2 spamassasin score
When any mail is rejected I always can explain (4 is marked as SPAM, 8 is
rejected)
- you have invalid .... (headers, content, body ...., also invalid SPF). If
you want to decrease score by 3 made one valid (terminated with -all) SPF
definition.
80% admins accept this always, they just don't know before it "wtf is spf
???" ;)
I hope you all understeand what want to say, my english is realy .... Let's
say bad ;)
But please don't give a bad score for NEUTRAL. It's supposed to be just
like no SPF at all.
Please see here:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3616#c4
for a discussion.
Scott Kitterman