RE: Dealing with SPF problems

Sorry, this is bad definition, I have problem to balance some other mechanism 
which afect 
indirectly spamassasin, to explain better should be :

pass     ->     -3 spamassasin score
softfail ->     +2 spamassasin score
neutral  ->     0 spamassasin score



> > - fail is fail -> rejected
> > - pass ->    -1 spamassasin score
> > - softfail ->        +4 spamassasin score
> > - neutral -> +2 spamassasin score
> But please don't give a bad score for NEUTRAL.  It's supposed to be
> just
> like no SPF at all.