Re: NULL

On Oct 24, 11:19am, Michael D'Errico wrote:

If PMDF claims support for RFC 1652 and changes bare CR's, bare LF's, 
or LFCR to CRLF, then it is broken.

 
        Taking Michael a little out of context:  I need to reply 
with the subject line  "Lessons Learned"  regarding conversions.

Michael D'Errico
Software.com

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: NULL, (continued) Re: NULL, Rick Troth Re: NULL, Ned Freed Re: NULL, Michael D'Errico Re: NULL, Ned Freed C-T-E's (was Re: NULL), Michael D'Errico Re: C-T-E's (was Re: NULL), Ned Freed Re: C-T-E's (was Re: NULL), Keith Moore Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta Message not available [no subject], Paul Rarey Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta Re: NULL, Rick Troth <= Re: NULL, Michael D'Errico The dual meaning of c-t-e's, Stephen D Crocker Re: NULL, Steve Dorner Re: NULL, Michael D'Errico Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta Re: NULL, Dave Crocker Re: NULL, Keld J\|rn Simonsen Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta East vs West (was Re: NULL), Mr Rhys Weatherley Re: East vs West (was Re: NULL), Kenichi Handa

Previous by Date:	Re: NULL, Rick Troth
Next by Date:	Re: About C-T-Es and transports (Re: NULL), Rick Troth
Previous by Thread:	Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta
Next by Thread:	Re: NULL, Michael D'Errico
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]