Re: NULL

At 1:19 PM 10/24/94, Michael D'Errico wrote:

I also disagree that binary is evil, as so many on this list seem to argue.


I've really only heard one person arguing even implicitly that binary is
evil; that's Ohta.  And he hasn't said it outright, just implied it by
refusing to accept CTE: binary as a reasonable solution to his problems.


You confuse CTE and transport.

Binary transport, not "CTE: binary", is the reasonable solution.

                                                        Masataka Ohta

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: C-T-E's (was Re: NULL), (continued) Re: C-T-E's (was Re: NULL), Ned Freed Re: C-T-E's (was Re: NULL), Keith Moore Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta Message not available [no subject], Paul Rarey Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta Re: NULL, Rick Troth Re: NULL, Michael D'Errico The dual meaning of c-t-e's, Stephen D Crocker Re: NULL, Steve Dorner Re: NULL, Michael D'Errico Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta <= Re: NULL, Dave Crocker Re: NULL, Keld J\|rn Simonsen Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta East vs West (was Re: NULL), Mr Rhys Weatherley Re: East vs West (was Re: NULL), Kenichi Handa MIME charset and I18N/L10N (was: East vs West), Masataka Ohta UNICODE (was Re: NULL), Keith Moore Re: UNICODE (was Re: NULL), Masataka Ohta Re: NULL, Patrik Faltstrom Re: NULL, Keld J\|rn Simonsen

Previous by Date:	Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta
Next by Date:	[no subject], Paul Rarey
Previous by Thread:	Re: NULL, Michael D'Errico
Next by Thread:	Re: NULL, Dave Crocker
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]