On 06/27/2013 02:24 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
Stephen Farrell <stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie> wrote:
> However, before getting into that I'd like to hear from
> folks who've been on or chaired nomcoms. I know a lot of
> it is done remotely, but how important is the f2f part
> that happens during meetings? Would it really be ok if
> say 5 voting members could never come to a meeting
> whilst serving? (And I think that'd not be an unlikely
> outcome.)
Please note two things:
1) under the original proposal and my revised one, you have
attend in person somewhat regularly.
2) for the November meeting, the nomcom *itself* must be present.
Tend to agree.
I think it unrealistic to think that the nomcom itself could
be remote for that meeting. For the summer and march meeting,
the nomcom could be anywhere.
Not this year:-)
so, even if you are eligible, don't volunteer for the nomcom if you can't
attend the november meeting.
But doesn't that run counter to one aspect of SM's otherwise
reasonable goal? (And if getting randomly picked for nomcom
implied some I* thing has to pay your way to the Nov meeting,
then this is IMO a *much* larger change proposal.)
S.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software
Works