Gary> I really hate how long it takes for formail -s procmail to run on
Gary> a large mailbox. I've posted separately, based upon some
Gary> experiments a potential speedup of 10x, when formail can avoid
Gary> creating a new process. I suggested that formail and procmail can
Gary> be combined, and they would differ in function based upon the
Gary> program name when they're called.
Isn't that a red herring? You'd still need to create a new process
even if it were the same program.
I'd have nothing against adding syntax sugar to procmail to do what
formail already does, but I think there would still be vaule in a
separate formail program.
--
A true pessimist won't be discouraged by a little success.
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail