On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Terry Fielder wrote:
I thought after defining SPF v1 the council would proceed to define SPF v
(next e.g. 3?)
I think it is time to proceed/begin to define the next SPF. I think every
one is waiting for SPF to become a RFC. But at the rate this seems to be
going that could be another year. We could get a lot done on the
improvements and changes we think are best from what has been learned so
far. For this I think the Council should still exist. Wheter there is a
yes not election to extend the terms for a year or wheter a new election
for a new council is needed.
Quick Poll
Yes/No Should council terms be extended for an additional year?
Yes/No Should a new election take place for a council?
--
Boyd Gerber <gerberb(_at_)zenez(_dot_)com>
ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 84047
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com